Jit: run throw helper merge phase before morph by AndyAyersMS · Pull Request #35255 · dotnet/runtime

AndyAyersMS · 2020-04-21T19:27:50Z

Now that we have pred lists before morph, we can move the throw helper
tail merge phase earlier in the phase list.

This has two benefits:

we can now merge a few more cases, because morph can introduce unique
temps for otherwise identical calls;
it saves some throughput, because we no longer need to morph duplicate
calls.

There is more opportunity here to reduce code size if we can find the right
heuristic in morph to decide if throw helpers should be called or tail-called,
though the overall benefit is small (~600 methods, ~2000 bytes). I left the
current heuristic in place as I couldn't come up with anything better.

Fixes #35135.

Now that we have pred lists before morph, we can move the throw helper tail merge phase earlier in the phase list. This has two benefits: * we can now merge a few more cases, because morph can introduce unique temps for otherwise identical calls; * it saves some throughput, because we no longer need to morph duplicate calls. There is more opportunity here to reduce code size if we can find the right heuristic in morph to decide if throw helpers should be called or tail-called, though the overall benefit is small (~600 methods, ~2000k bytes). I left the current heuristic in place as I couldn't come up with anything better. Fixes dotnet#35135.

AndyAyersMS · 2020-04-21T19:30:01Z

cc @dotnet/jit-contrib @benaadams

Diffs on Bens' example:

PMI CodeSize Diffs for c:\bugs\asp-throw\ex.exe for x64 default jit
Summary of Code Size diffs:
(Lower is better)
Total bytes of diff: -83 (-0.59% of base)
    diff is an improvement.
Top file improvements (bytes):
         -83 : ex.dasm (-0.59% of base)
1 total files with Code Size differences (1 improved, 0 regressed), 0 unchanged.
Top method improvements (bytes):
         -83 (-9.78% of base) : ex.dasm - HttpParser:ParseRequestLine(IHttpRequestLineHandler,ReadOnlySpan`1):this
Top method improvements (percentages):
         -83 (-9.78% of base) : ex.dasm - HttpParser:ParseRequestLine(IHttpRequestLineHandler,ReadOnlySpan`1):this
1 total methods with Code Size differences (1 improved, 0 regressed), 113 unchanged.

Some hits across full FX as well:

PMI CodeSize Diffs for System.Private.CoreLib.dll, framework assemblies for x64 default jit
Summary of Code Size diffs:
(Lower is better)
Total bytes of diff: -606 (-0.00% of base)
    diff is an improvement.
Top file regressions (bytes):
         101 : Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.dasm (0.00% of base)
           6 : System.Transactions.Local.dasm (0.01% of base)
           1 : Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.dasm (0.00% of base)
Top file improvements (bytes):
        -374 : System.Linq.Parallel.dasm (-0.02% of base)
        -114 : System.Collections.Concurrent.dasm (-0.03% of base)
         -88 : System.Private.Xml.dasm (-0.00% of base)
         -73 : System.Private.CoreLib.dasm (-0.00% of base)
         -33 : System.Text.Json.dasm (-0.00% of base)
         -11 : System.Diagnostics.PerformanceCounter.dasm (-0.01% of base)
          -8 : System.Net.Primitives.dasm (-0.01% of base)
          -7 : System.Net.Sockets.dasm (-0.00% of base)
          -2 : System.Security.Cryptography.Algorithms.dasm (-0.00% of base)
          -2 : System.Security.Cryptography.Cng.dasm (-0.00% of base)
          -2 : System.Security.Cryptography.Pkcs.dasm (-0.00% of base)
14 total files with Code Size differences (11 improved, 3 regressed), 252 unchanged.
Top method regressions (bytes):
         149 ( 4.15% of base) : Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.dasm - SourceMemberContainerTypeSymbol:ComputeInterfaceImplementations(DiagnosticBag,CancellationToken):ImmutableArray`1:this
           6 ( 2.08% of base) : System.Transactions.Local.dasm - TransactionScope:SetCurrent(Transaction):this
           4 ( 0.18% of base) : Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.dasm - SourceMemberContainerTypeSymbol:ForceComplete(SourceLocation,CancellationToken):this
           3 ( 0.46% of base) : System.Private.CoreLib.dasm - SorterGenericArray:DownHeap(int,int,int):this
           2 ( 0.08% of base) : System.Private.Xml.dasm - XmlSerializationReader:ReadArray(String,String):Object:this
           1 ( 0.20% of base) : Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.dasm - DocumentationCommentCompiler:VisitNamespace(NamespaceSymbol):this
           1 ( 0.02% of base) : Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.dasm - CommonCompiler:RunCore(TextWriter,ErrorLogger,CancellationToken):int:this
Top method improvements (bytes):
        -374 (-1.98% of base) : System.Linq.Parallel.dasm - SortHelper`2:MergeSortCooperatively():this (7 methods)
         -45 (-3.19% of base) : System.Private.Xml.dasm - XmlCharCheckingReader:Read():bool:this
         -45 (-0.86% of base) : System.Private.Xml.dasm - <ReadAsync>d__36:MoveNext():this
         -44 (-3.30% of base) : System.Private.CoreLib.dasm - Task:WaitAllCore(ref,int,CancellationToken):bool
         -42 (-12.32% of base) : System.Collections.Concurrent.dasm - ConcurrentDictionary`2:ThrowIfInvalidObjectValue(Object) (7 methods)
         -40 (-2.20% of base) : Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.dasm - DocumentationCommentCompiler:DefaultVisit(Symbol):this
         -36 (-1.68% of base) : System.Collections.Concurrent.dasm - ConcurrentDictionary`2:System.Collections.IDictionary.Add(Object,Object):this (7 methods)
         -36 (-1.68% of base) : System.Collections.Concurrent.dasm - ConcurrentDictionary`2:System.Collections.IDictionary.set_Item(Object,Object):this (7 methods)
         -33 (-0.17% of base) : System.Text.Json.dasm - <ReadAsync>d__11`1:MoveNext():this (7 methods)
         -11 (-2.03% of base) : System.Diagnostics.PerformanceCounter.dasm - PerformanceDataRegistryKey:GetValue(String,bool):ref:this
         -10 (-0.39% of base) : Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.dasm - MethodCompiler:CompileNamedType(NamedTypeSymbol):this
          -9 (-1.31% of base) : System.Private.CoreLib.dasm - SorterGenericArray:InsertionSort(int,int):this
          -8 (-0.26% of base) : System.Net.Primitives.dasm - CookieContainer:AgeCookies(String):bool:this
          -7 (-3.98% of base) : System.Net.Sockets.dasm - IOControlKeepAlive:Fill(ref):this
          -7 (-1.89% of base) : System.Private.CoreLib.dasm - TextInfo:AddTitlecaseLetter(byref,byref,int,int):int:this
          -3 (-0.71% of base) : Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.dasm - CSharpSemanticModel:GetParameterSymbol(ImmutableArray`1,ParameterSyntax,CancellationToken):ParameterSymbol:this
          -3 (-0.34% of base) : System.Private.CoreLib.dasm - Vector128`1:GetHashCode():int:this (6 methods)
          -3 (-0.39% of base) : System.Private.CoreLib.dasm - Vector256`1:GetHashCode():int:this (6 methods)
          -3 (-0.08% of base) : System.Private.CoreLib.dasm - Vector256`1:ToString():String:this (6 methods)
          -3 (-0.36% of base) : System.Private.CoreLib.dasm - Vector256`1:<Equals>g__SoftwareFallback|12_0(byref,Vector256`1):bool (6 methods)
Top method regressions (percentages):
         149 ( 4.15% of base) : Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.dasm - SourceMemberContainerTypeSymbol:ComputeInterfaceImplementations(DiagnosticBag,CancellationToken):ImmutableArray`1:this
           6 ( 2.08% of base) : System.Transactions.Local.dasm - TransactionScope:SetCurrent(Transaction):this
           3 ( 0.46% of base) : System.Private.CoreLib.dasm - SorterGenericArray:DownHeap(int,int,int):this
           1 ( 0.20% of base) : Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.dasm - DocumentationCommentCompiler:VisitNamespace(NamespaceSymbol):this
           4 ( 0.18% of base) : Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.dasm - SourceMemberContainerTypeSymbol:ForceComplete(SourceLocation,CancellationToken):this
           2 ( 0.08% of base) : System.Private.Xml.dasm - XmlSerializationReader:ReadArray(String,String):Object:this
           1 ( 0.02% of base) : Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.dasm - CommonCompiler:RunCore(TextWriter,ErrorLogger,CancellationToken):int:this
Top method improvements (percentages):
         -42 (-12.32% of base) : System.Collections.Concurrent.dasm - ConcurrentDictionary`2:ThrowIfInvalidObjectValue(Object) (7 methods)
          -7 (-3.98% of base) : System.Net.Sockets.dasm - IOControlKeepAlive:Fill(ref):this
         -44 (-3.30% of base) : System.Private.CoreLib.dasm - Task:WaitAllCore(ref,int,CancellationToken):bool
         -45 (-3.19% of base) : System.Private.Xml.dasm - XmlCharCheckingReader:Read():bool:this
         -40 (-2.20% of base) : Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.dasm - DocumentationCommentCompiler:DefaultVisit(Symbol):this
         -11 (-2.03% of base) : System.Diagnostics.PerformanceCounter.dasm - PerformanceDataRegistryKey:GetValue(String,bool):ref:this
        -374 (-1.98% of base) : System.Linq.Parallel.dasm - SortHelper`2:MergeSortCooperatively():this (7 methods)
          -7 (-1.89% of base) : System.Private.CoreLib.dasm - TextInfo:AddTitlecaseLetter(byref,byref,int,int):int:this
         -36 (-1.68% of base) : System.Collections.Concurrent.dasm - ConcurrentDictionary`2:System.Collections.IDictionary.set_Item(Object,Object):this (7 methods)
         -36 (-1.68% of base) : System.Collections.Concurrent.dasm - ConcurrentDictionary`2:System.Collections.IDictionary.Add(Object,Object):this (7 methods)
          -9 (-1.31% of base) : System.Private.CoreLib.dasm - SorterGenericArray:InsertionSort(int,int):this
         -45 (-0.86% of base) : System.Private.Xml.dasm - <ReadAsync>d__36:MoveNext():this
          -3 (-0.71% of base) : Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.dasm - CSharpSemanticModel:GetParameterSymbol(ImmutableArray`1,ParameterSyntax,CancellationToken):ParameterSymbol:this
          -3 (-0.51% of base) : System.Private.CoreLib.dasm - Vector64`1:GetHashCode():int:this (6 methods)
          -3 (-0.39% of base) : System.Private.CoreLib.dasm - Vector256`1:GetHashCode():int:this (6 methods)
         -10 (-0.39% of base) : Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.dasm - MethodCompiler:CompileNamedType(NamedTypeSymbol):this
          -3 (-0.36% of base) : System.Private.CoreLib.dasm - Vector256`1:<Equals>g__SoftwareFallback|12_0(byref,Vector256`1):bool (6 methods)
          -3 (-0.34% of base) : System.Private.CoreLib.dasm - Vector128`1:GetHashCode():int:this (6 methods)
          -8 (-0.26% of base) : System.Net.Primitives.dasm - CookieContainer:AgeCookies(String):bool:this
          -2 (-0.18% of base) : System.Security.Cryptography.Pkcs.dasm - KeyFormatHelper:WriteEncryptedPkcs8(ReadOnlySpan`1,ReadOnlySpan`1,AsnWriter,PbeParameters):AsnWriter
32 total methods with Code Size differences (25 improved, 7 regressed), 244486 unchanged.

The one big regression is block weight/RA related.

AndyAyersMS · 2020-04-21T19:51:48Z

Odd, a comment by @EgorBo was here but vanished. I'll recreate it...

Is it going to fold comparisons of constant strings? (don't know where GenTree::Compare is used)

Yes, it could, for reference equality checks. GenTree::Compare is invoked by gtFoldExprCompare. I didn't see this happen, but will play with some test cases. We probably fold those away later on during the optimizer, so this might not lead to observable diffs.

EgorBo · 2020-04-21T19:52:46Z

@AndyAyersMS
I removed my comment because I realized that constant strings are compared via string.Equals call instead of GT_EQ/GT_NE 🙂

benaadams · 2020-04-21T20:28:08Z

Thank you; this is very helpful for throw helpers that take larger data types (e.g. Span<byte>) as there is a bunch of preamble in passing them

AndyAyersMS · 2020-04-23T08:05:22Z

@dotnet/jit-contrib ping...

erozenfeld

LGTM, just one question.

erozenfeld · 2020-04-23T20:13:31Z

src/coreclr/src/jit/flowgraph.cpp

        BasicBlock* const nonCanonicalBlock = iter.Get();
        BasicBlock* const canonicalBlock    = iter.GetValue();
        flowList*         nextPredEdge      = nullptr;
+        bool              updated           = false;


Why do we need this new local?

Previously updateCount would overstate the number of cases transformed, so I added updated to get the accounting right.

Admittedly we don't use this now more accurate the count for much. I had ambitions of using it to adjust optNoReturnCallCount so that the tail call heuristic in morph would also see a more accurate value and hence make better decisions, but doing that made things worse overall (bigger code size).

I see, github shows diffs inaccurately, which that confused me and I didn't see that there was a semantic change. Previously we incremented updateCount once per predecessor and now we increment updateCount once per non-canonical block if there was a predecessor change. That makes sense.

AndyAyersMS · 2020-04-23T21:47:59Z

Not sure what's up with the perf leg, am going to ignore it.

Dotnet-GitSync-Bot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Apr 21, 2020

erozenfeld approved these changes Apr 23, 2020

View reviewed changes

AndyAyersMS merged commit b828309 into dotnet:master Apr 23, 2020

AndyAyersMS deleted the RunThrowMergingBeforeMorph branch April 23, 2020 21:48

benaadams mentioned this pull request Apr 24, 2020

Make HTTP/1.1 startline parsing "safe" dotnet/aspnetcore#20885

Merged

ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 9, 2020

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Jit: run throw helper merge phase before morph#35255

Jit: run throw helper merge phase before morph#35255
AndyAyersMS merged 1 commit intodotnet:masterfrom
AndyAyersMS:RunThrowMergingBeforeMorph

AndyAyersMS commented Apr 21, 2020 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

AndyAyersMS commented Apr 21, 2020

Uh oh!

AndyAyersMS commented Apr 21, 2020 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

EgorBo commented Apr 21, 2020

Uh oh!

benaadams commented Apr 21, 2020

Uh oh!

AndyAyersMS commented Apr 23, 2020

Uh oh!

erozenfeld left a comment

Uh oh!

erozenfeld Apr 23, 2020

Uh oh!

AndyAyersMS Apr 23, 2020 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

erozenfeld Apr 23, 2020

Uh oh!

AndyAyersMS commented Apr 23, 2020

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

Conversation

AndyAyersMS commented Apr 21, 2020 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

AndyAyersMS commented Apr 21, 2020

Uh oh!

AndyAyersMS commented Apr 21, 2020 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

EgorBo commented Apr 21, 2020

Uh oh!

benaadams commented Apr 21, 2020

Uh oh!

AndyAyersMS commented Apr 23, 2020

Uh oh!

erozenfeld left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

erozenfeld Apr 23, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

AndyAyersMS Apr 23, 2020 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

erozenfeld Apr 23, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

AndyAyersMS commented Apr 23, 2020

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

AndyAyersMS commented Apr 21, 2020 •

edited

Loading

AndyAyersMS commented Apr 21, 2020 •

edited

Loading

AndyAyersMS Apr 23, 2020 •

edited

Loading