-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
Description
Description
When generating a dynamic method both with many unconditional jumps, the ILGenerator's computation of maxstack is way to large - it adds the max stack of each basic block ending with an unconditional transfer (br, ret, throw, etc). If the generated code has many such bbs (eg, from the "then" clauses of if-then-else constructs) this sum can overflow 2^16. When it does, the maxstack recorded/used is the computed value mod 2^16. When that is less than the correct value, the JIT throws an InvalidProgramException.
For example, if there are 2^12 (4096) such blocks, each with a max stack of 2^4 (16), the computed maxstack is 2^16. That value mod 2^16 is zero. Since that is less than the actual (16 or more), the JIT will throw.
See the attached example code. This is written as a "test" that passes when the bug is present. The line enclosed by Assert.ThrowsException really should not throw.
Reproduction Steps
Build and run the unit test code above with .Net Core (verified with 3.1, and many later versions).
Expected behavior
The line marked with Assert.ThrowsException should not throw.
Actual behavior
An InvalidProgramException is thrown. Also, the computed max stack values (as written to console) are way too large. The actual max stack needed for this dynamic method is 4, and it doesn't depend on the number of basic blocks (the num parameter). The computed max stack values increase with num.
Regression?
No response
Known Workarounds
No good ones. This is blocking.
Configuration
No response
Other information
I'm working on a fix by fixing the computation in ILGenerator.cs.