Update file-based app sources directly from GitHub#82541
Merged
Conversation
Member
Author
|
@DamianEdwards Manual testing looking good so far 
|
Member
Author
|
CI failures are dead-letters |
jjonescz
approved these changes
Feb 26, 2026
jjonescz
approved these changes
Feb 26, 2026
This was referenced Feb 27, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Having difficulties getting the FBA source package in timely manner. Last build I saw of the package was from 18th Feb. It seems better to just get the sources from GitHub directly.
@jjonescz could you please take a look? Let me know if the general approach feels reasonable.
My main concern right now is rate limiting from GitHub, we should probably pass an auth token.. @JoeRobich do you happen to know how to get a GitHub PAT, good for public repos or similar, in the context of this script?