---

This section details on the original issue you should resolve

<issue_title>'DocumentationCommentTriviaSyntax.Ancestors(true)' does not return any ancestors but 'AncestorsAndSelf(true)' does</issue_title>
<issue_description>Version Used:
3.6

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Get the DocumentationCommentTriviaSyntax that represents the comment in following snippet:

public class TestMe
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Some summary.
    /// </summary>
    /// <value>
    /// Some value.
    /// </value>
    private int i;
}

2. Invoke SyntaxNode.Ancestors() and SyntaxNode.AncestorsAndSelf(true) on the DocumentationCommentTriviaSyntax.
3. Compare the results and find out that Ancestors() does neither return the FieldDeclarationSyntax, nor the ClassDeclarationSyntax, nor the CompilationUnitSyntax.
   In contrast, AncestorsAndSelf() returns them all.

Expected Behavior:
Invoking SyntaxNode.Ancestors(true) on a DocumentationCommentTriviaSyntax returns all ancestors, similar to SyntaxNode.AncestorsAndSelf(true), except the trivia (no self).

Actual Behavior:
SyntaxNode.Ancestors(true) invoked on a DocumentationCommentTriviaSyntax returns no ancestors.

SyntaxNode.AncestorsAndSelf(true) invoked on the same DocumentationCommentTriviaSyntax not only returns the trivia as expected, but also all the other ancestors that SyntaxNode.Ancestors(true) is missing to return.</issue_description>

<agent_instructions>See conversation for likely fix.</agent_instructions>

Comments on the Issue (you are @copilot in this section)

@CyrusNajmabadi ```c# public IEnumerable Ancestors(bool ascendOutOfTrivia = true) { return this.Parent? .AncestorsAndSelf(ascendOutOfTrivia) ?? SpecializedCollections.EmptyEnumerable(); } ```

should likely be updated to be:

        public IEnumerable<SyntaxNode> Ancestors(bool ascendOutOfTrivia = true)
        {
            return GetParent(this, ascendOutOfTrivia)?
                .AncestorsAndSelf(ascendOutOfTrivia) ??
                SpecializedCollections.EmptyEnumerable<SyntaxNode>();
        }
```</body></comment_new>
</comments>