Skip to content

Merge master to master-vs-deps#51436

Merged
40 commits merged intomaster-vs-depsfrom
merges/master-to-master-vs-deps
Feb 24, 2021
Merged

Merge master to master-vs-deps#51436
40 commits merged intomaster-vs-depsfrom
merges/master-to-master-vs-deps

Conversation

@dotnet-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

This is an automatically generated pull request from master into master-vs-deps.

Once all conflicts are resolved and all the tests pass, you are free to merge the pull request. 🐯

Troubleshooting conflicts

Identify authors of changes which introduced merge conflicts

Scroll to the bottom, then for each file containing conflicts copy its path into the following searches:

Usually the most recent change to a file between the two branches is considered to have introduced the conflicts, but sometimes it will be necessary to look for the conflicting lines and check the blame in each branch. Generally the author whose change introduced the conflicts should pull down this PR, fix the conflicts locally, then push up a commit resolving the conflicts.

Resolve merge conflicts using your local repo

Sometimes merge conflicts may be present on GitHub but merging locally will work without conflicts. This is due to differences between the merge algorithm used in local git versus the one used by GitHub.

git fetch --all
git checkout merges/master-to-master-vs-deps
git reset --hard upstream/master-vs-deps
git merge upstream/master
# Fix merge conflicts
git commit
git push upstream merges/master-to-master-vs-deps --force

allisonchou and others added 30 commits February 11, 2021 11:33
There were two situations where the previous code would allow net5.0
execution to access memory outside array bounds:

1. Replacement of an element in _items with a shorter array. Even though
_items is indirectly exposed through SyncRoot, this is not a serious
concern because replacement of an array element means unsafe/bad
bytecode is already running in the process to perform the replacement.

2. A torn read of SegmentedArray<T> could allow a read of the _items
field of one structure and the _length field of a different structure.
This is a concern because it allows concurrent execution to reach a
state where memory safety is violated without a precondition that unsafe
code be running.

This reverts commit 15e1fd3.
Run server GC OOP with reduced process priority
Optimize storage for segment information
…se/dev16.9-vs-deps

Merge release/dev16.9 to release/dev16.9-vs-deps
JoeRobich and others added 5 commits February 23, 2021 16:06
…erges/release/dev16.9-vs-deps-to-release/dev16.10-vs-deps
Add a missing check for AccessorDeclaration
…to-release/dev16.10-vs-deps

Merge release/dev16.9-vs-deps to release/dev16.10-vs-deps
@dotnet-bot dotnet-bot requested review from a team as code owners February 24, 2021 03:03
@dotnet-bot dotnet-bot added Area-Infrastructure auto-merge Merge Conflicts There are merge conflicts with the base branch. labels Feb 24, 2021
Copy link

@ghost ghost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto-approval

@ghost ghost merged commit 474181b into master-vs-deps Feb 24, 2021
@ghost ghost deleted the merges/master-to-master-vs-deps branch February 24, 2021 23:50
@ghost ghost added this to the Next milestone Feb 24, 2021
@allisonchou allisonchou modified the milestones: Next, 16.10.P2 Mar 29, 2021
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Area-Infrastructure auto-merge Merge Conflicts There are merge conflicts with the base branch.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants