Merged
Conversation
There were two situations where the previous code would allow net5.0 execution to access memory outside array bounds: 1. Replacement of an element in _items with a shorter array. Even though _items is indirectly exposed through SyncRoot, this is not a serious concern because replacement of an array element means unsafe/bad bytecode is already running in the process to perform the replacement. 2. A torn read of SegmentedArray<T> could allow a read of the _items field of one structure and the _length field of a different structure. This is a concern because it allows concurrent execution to reach a state where memory safety is violated without a precondition that unsafe code be running. This reverts commit 15e1fd3.
Run server GC OOP with reduced process priority
Optimize storage for segment information
…se/dev16.9-vs-deps Merge release/dev16.9 to release/dev16.9-vs-deps
Merge release/dev16.10 to master
…erges/release/dev16.9-vs-deps-to-release/dev16.10-vs-deps
Add a missing check for AccessorDeclaration
…to-release/dev16.10-vs-deps Merge release/dev16.9-vs-deps to release/dev16.10-vs-deps
…-to-master-vs-deps Merge release/dev16.10-vs-deps to master-vs-deps
Merge release/dev16.10 to master
[LSP] Use TextEdits in completion
This pull request was closed.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an automatically generated pull request from master into master-vs-deps.
Once all conflicts are resolved and all the tests pass, you are free to merge the pull request. 🐯
Troubleshooting conflicts
Identify authors of changes which introduced merge conflicts
Scroll to the bottom, then for each file containing conflicts copy its path into the following searches:
Usually the most recent change to a file between the two branches is considered to have introduced the conflicts, but sometimes it will be necessary to look for the conflicting lines and check the blame in each branch. Generally the author whose change introduced the conflicts should pull down this PR, fix the conflicts locally, then push up a commit resolving the conflicts.
Resolve merge conflicts using your local repo
Sometimes merge conflicts may be present on GitHub but merging locally will work without conflicts. This is due to differences between the merge algorithm used in local git versus the one used by GitHub.
git fetch --all git checkout merges/master-to-master-vs-deps git reset --hard upstream/master-vs-deps git merge upstream/master # Fix merge conflicts git commit git push upstream merges/master-to-master-vs-deps --force