Make db lock static to investigate issue.#48394
Conversation
|
@CyrusNajmabadi Marked this as a draft for the investigation. Can you modify the implementation to force the use of the V2 provider (overriding the experiment and normal default)? |
a773745 to
7b3e68a
Compare
Done! |
a158729 to
29afb46
Compare
|
@sharwell do we want to take this (reverting the default-change portion of course)? It's a very small change prior to hte larger refactoring you're proposing. |
|
Marking as ready for review. I would like if we could take this simple change @sharwell. We can then take the composition change approach you're suggesting. That way, if we have to roll that back, we can rollback to this safe and simple change. Thanks! |
sharwell
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a generally safe change. Recommend squashing before or during merge to avoid 7 commits for the small change. 😄
|
Will squash on commit. |
b91e6b2 to
9dec431
Compare
|
Hello @CyrusNajmabadi! Because this pull request has the p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (
|
9dec431 to
62f32be
Compare
62f32be to
6e7f411
Compare
|
@CyrusNajmabadi A bunch of these appeared in the failed build. Probably not a bug from this pull request, but generally indicates a bug. |
No description provided.