Skip to content

Fix PropertiesInRecursivePattern_PositionalInFirstProperty_AfterComma#45990

Merged
JoeRobich merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
dev/jorobich/skip-test
Jul 15, 2020
Merged

Fix PropertiesInRecursivePattern_PositionalInFirstProperty_AfterComma#45990
JoeRobich merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
dev/jorobich/skip-test

Conversation

@JoeRobich
Copy link
Member

@JoeRobich JoeRobich commented Jul 15, 2020

Adds skip back to PropertiesInRecursivePattern_PositionalInFirstProperty_AfterComma which was unskipped in https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/pull/45771/files
Fixes the test based on Gafter's comment.

Also see #40015 for other skipped pattern tests

@JoeRobich JoeRobich requested a review from a team as a code owner July 15, 2020 00:28
@JoeRobich
Copy link
Member Author

@gafter We are seeing this test fail and are setting it back to be skipped.

@gafter
Copy link
Member

gafter commented Jul 15, 2020

        await VerifyItemExistsAsync(markup, "P1");

You can fix this test instead of skipping it by replacing this line with

            await VerifyNoItemsExistAsync(markup);

Refers to: src/EditorFeatures/CSharpTest/Completion/CompletionProviders/PropertySubPatternCompletionProviderTests.cs:506 in be94205. [](commit_id = be94205, deletion_comment = False)

@gafter
Copy link
Member

gafter commented Jul 15, 2020

/cc @CyrusNajmabadi

@JoeRobich
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @gafter. A fix works even better.

@JoeRobich JoeRobich changed the title Skip PropertiesInRecursivePattern_PositionalInFirstProperty_AfterComma Fix PropertiesInRecursivePattern_PositionalInFirstProperty_AfterComma Jul 15, 2020
@JoeRobich JoeRobich merged commit 3fc93da into master Jul 15, 2020
@ghost ghost added this to the Next milestone Jul 15, 2020
@jcouv jcouv deleted the dev/jorobich/skip-test branch July 15, 2020 05:25
@JoeRobich JoeRobich modified the milestones: Next, 16.8.P1 Jul 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants