Skip to content

Target Remote.Workspaces to .NET Core 3.1#45091

Merged
genlu merged 2 commits intodotnet:masterfrom
genlu:RemoteWorkspacesCore
Jun 12, 2020
Merged

Target Remote.Workspaces to .NET Core 3.1#45091
genlu merged 2 commits intodotnet:masterfrom
genlu:RemoteWorkspacesCore

Conversation

@genlu
Copy link
Member

@genlu genlu commented Jun 11, 2020

@genlu genlu requested a review from a team as a code owner June 11, 2020 21:23
@genlu genlu added the Area-IDE label Jun 11, 2020
@genlu genlu requested a review from a team June 11, 2020 22:12
@tmat
Copy link
Member

tmat commented Jun 11, 2020

I wonder if there is much benefit right now to target net472 and netcoreapp3.1 vs. netstandard2.0?

@genlu
Copy link
Member Author

genlu commented Jun 11, 2020

Not sure. I'm trying to be consistent with what @sharwell is doing.

@sharwell
Copy link
Contributor

@tmat netstandard2.0 is not a supported scenario for C# 8 or nullable reference types

@tmat
Copy link
Member

tmat commented Jun 11, 2020

OK, as long as we know what the reasons are. Just keep in mind that there might be a trade-off: if we make all projects multi-targeted we make Roslyn.sln much slower to work in.

@genlu genlu merged commit 3e9c9e8 into dotnet:master Jun 12, 2020
@ghost ghost added this to the Next milestone Jun 12, 2020
@genlu genlu deleted the RemoteWorkspacesCore branch June 12, 2020 01:58
<OutputType>Library</OutputType>
<RootNamespace>Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Remote</RootNamespace>
<TargetFramework>net472</TargetFramework>
<TargetFrameworks>net472;netcoreapp3.1</TargetFrameworks>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

📝 netcoreapp3.1 should appear first in the list for consistency

@dibarbet dibarbet modified the milestones: Next, 16.7.P4 Jun 30, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants