Skip to content

Merging the regex work into master.#29580

Merged
dpoeschl merged 274 commits intomasterfrom
features/embeddedRegex
Aug 31, 2018
Merged

Merging the regex work into master.#29580
dpoeschl merged 274 commits intomasterfrom
features/embeddedRegex

Conversation

@CyrusNajmabadi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Followup to #25517 once all the licensing stuff is merged into features/embeddedRegex.

CyrusNajmabadi and others added 30 commits April 4, 2018 10:41
Merging master into Features/embedded regex
@CyrusNajmabadi CyrusNajmabadi requested a review from a team as a code owner August 29, 2018 02:44
@CyrusNajmabadi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Tagging @dpoeschl @jinujoseph @jcouv

@CyrusNajmabadi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

test WIP

@CyrusNajmabadi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Tagging @jcouv @dpoeschl . Can you sign off on this. It doesn't have to be merged. But it would be good to have the signoff to expedite things once the final legal stuff comes in. Thanks!

@jcouv jcouv added the Area-IDE label Aug 29, 2018
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dpoeschl dpoeschl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️ except handling the public api & legal things.

Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CodeStyle.NotificationOption.Severity.set -> void
abstract Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Editing.SyntaxGenerator.AliasImportDeclaration(string aliasIdentifierName, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxNode name) -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxNode
abstract Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Editing.SyntaxGenerator.NameExpression(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.INamespaceOrTypeSymbol namespaceOrTypeSymbol) -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxNode
const Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Classification.ClassificationTypeNames.RegexAlternation = "regex - alternation" -> string
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This & licensing are my only concerns about going into master. @jinujoseph Who should we talk to about the public api change?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: this public api change is just keeping in line with how we've done things around classification. Namely that we export our classification type names as public constants. Presumably this is so other extensions can know aobut these names and interact with them if they want (for example, they can prioritize their own classifications above/below these ones).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming that these classifications would be returned by normal calls to the Classifier.GetClassifiedSpansAsync(...) outside of VS, these need to be public so that editors can handle them appropriately. I fully support adding them to the public API surface.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yaay. Thanks @DustinCampbell

@dpoeschl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

dpoeschl commented Aug 30, 2018

Re: Public API -- We can always switch them back to internal to get this into master and then create a separate PR/discussion for the Public API approval if needed.

EDIT: Nevermind, it got approved.

@dpoeschl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

As of this comment, the licensing change isn't merged yet (it's running tests) but I'm making a note here that all test runs have passed without that change in case we want to later justify merging in the face of unrelated integration failures. ✔

@dpoeschl dpoeschl requested a review from a team as a code owner August 31, 2018 04:33
@dpoeschl dpoeschl merged commit 59c08f6 into master Aug 31, 2018
@CyrusNajmabadi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Yaay!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants