Currently we report rude edits when explicitly implementing members of records that are normally synthesized, if the parameter names don't match what the compiler would synthesize. Since we now allow renaming parameters we no longer need this limit, as the symbol matcher ignores parameter names.
We shouldn't need to worry about capabilities here I don't think.
Code to be removed is marked with a reference to #52563 in source.
Currently we report rude edits when explicitly implementing members of records that are normally synthesized, if the parameter names don't match what the compiler would synthesize. Since we now allow renaming parameters we no longer need this limit, as the symbol matcher ignores parameter names.
We shouldn't need to worry about capabilities here I don't think.
Code to be removed is marked with a reference to #52563 in source.