There are some build errors here

C:\a_work\1\s\src\Core\maps\src\Platform\iOS\MauiMKMapView.cs(19,10): error CS8618: Non-nullable field '_handlerRef' must contain a non-null value when exiting constructor. Consider adding the 'required' modifier or declaring the field as nullable. [C:\a_work\1\s\src\Core\maps\src\Maps.csproj::TargetFramework=net9.0-maccatalyst18.0]
C:\a_work\1\s\src\Core\maps\src\Platform\iOS\MauiMKMapView.cs(27,4): error RS0016: Symbol 'Handler.get' is not part of the declared public API (https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn-analyzers/blob/main/src/PublicApiAnalyzers/PublicApiAnalyzers.Help.md) [C:\a_work\1\s\src\Core\maps\src\Maps.csproj::TargetFramework=net9.0-maccatalyst18.0]
C:\a_work\1\s\src\Core\maps\src\Platform\iOS\MauiMKMapView.cs(32,4): error RS0016: Symbol 'Handler.set' is not part of the declared public API (https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn-analyzers/blob/main/src/PublicApiAnalyzers/PublicApiAnalyzers.Help.md) [C:\a_work\1\s\src\Core\maps\src\Maps.csproj::TargetFramework=net9.0-maccatalyst18.0]
C:\a_work\1\s\src\Core\maps\src\Platform\iOS\MauiMKMapView.cs(19,10): error CS8618: Non-nullable field '_handlerRef' must contain a non-null value when exiting constructor. Consider adding the 'required' modifier or declaring the field as nullable. [C:\a_work\1\s\src\Core\maps\src\Maps.csproj::TargetFramework=net9.0-ios18.0]
C:\a_work\1\s\src\Core\maps\src\Platform\iOS\MauiMKMapView.cs(27,4): error RS0016: Symbol 'Handler.get' is not part of the declared public API (https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn-analyzers/blob/main/src/PublicApiAnalyzers/PublicApiAnalyzers.Help.md) [C:\a_work\1\s\src\Core\maps\src\Maps.csproj::TargetFramework=net9.0-ios18.0]
C:\a_work\1\s\src\Core\maps\src\Platform\iOS\MauiMKMapView.cs(32,4): error RS0016: Symbol 'Handler.set' is not part of the declared public API (https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn-analyzers/blob/main/src/PublicApiAnalyzers/PublicApiAnalyzers.Help.md) [C:\a_work\1\s\src\Core\maps\src\Maps.csproj::TargetFramework=net9.0-ios18.0]
7414 Warning(s)
6 Error(s)

Also this introduces new public APIs. If we want to fix this for .NET 9 we will need to find a way to do it without that, else it will probably be a fix for .NET 10. What we probably can do is make the public members internal for now?

Can you please address these @AnthonyNjuguna ?

This also fixes the issue #29346

@PureWeen @jfversluis We’ve fixed the build errors and added a test for the fix in the PR below. Could you please close this PR in favor of the new one?
#29369

@AnthonyNjuguna Could you rebase and fix the conflict? Thanks in advance.

Closed favor of this PR #29369