Allow index IsDescending to get empty array for all-descending#28489
Merged
roji merged 2 commits intodotnet:mainfrom Jul 26, 2022
Merged
Allow index IsDescending to get empty array for all-descending#28489roji merged 2 commits intodotnet:mainfrom
roji merged 2 commits intodotnet:mainfrom
Conversation
Member
Author
|
Question: is it worth introducing AllDescending or similar on IndexAttribute? Right now to specify all-descending, you do this ugly thing: [Index(..., IsDescending = new bool[0])] |
Member
|
I'd prefer adding |
Member
Author
|
@dotnet/efteam added AllDescending. |
AndriySvyryd
approved these changes
Jul 26, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Improves #27210 by allowing aan empty list parameter to IsDescending, meaning that all index columns should be descending.
Also normalizes explicitly-set all-ascending/all-descending to null/empty array respectively.
(addresses API review, #27588)