Skip to content

coreclr: Automatic port of triple slash from System.Buffers.Binary#2693

Merged
mairaw merged 12 commits intodotnet:masterfrom
carlossanlop:clr_buffers.binary
Aug 8, 2019
Merged

coreclr: Automatic port of triple slash from System.Buffers.Binary#2693
mairaw merged 12 commits intodotnet:masterfrom
carlossanlop:clr_buffers.binary

Conversation

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Contributor

Found a bug in the tool that was preventing it from porting coreclr triple slash comments.
Area owners: @layomia@JeremyKuhne@ahsonkhan

Language owners: @mairaw @rpetrusha

@carlossanlop carlossanlop self-assigned this Jul 3, 2019
@carlossanlop carlossanlop added the waiting-on-reviews Indicates PRs that cannot be merged because of the lack of reviews label Jul 3, 2019
@mairaw mairaw added this to the July 2019 milestone Jul 3, 2019
@mairaw mairaw added 🏁 Release: .NET Core 3.0 :checkered_flag: Release: .NET Core 3.0 new-content Indicates PRs that contain new articles labels Jul 3, 2019
@mairaw mairaw removed the request for review from rpetrusha July 3, 2019 23:32
Copy link
Contributor

@mairaw mairaw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @carlossanlop. Left a few comments to be considered.

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mairaw @rpetrusha I resolved all the suggestions, added extra params and returns, clarified the remarks. Can you please take a look?

@carlossanlop carlossanlop added changes-addressed Indicates PRs that had all comments addressed and are awaiting for new review and removed waiting-on-reviews Indicates PRs that cannot be merged because of the lack of reviews labels Jul 26, 2019
@carlossanlop
Copy link
Contributor Author

@layomia since you're the owner, can you also please take a quick look?

@carlossanlop carlossanlop requested a review from mairaw July 26, 2019 02:13
@carlossanlop
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mairaw @rpetrusha the build passed. Is this good to merge?

@ahsonkhan
Copy link
Contributor

Please give me some time to review this before merging. Tyvm.

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please give me some time to review this before merging. Tyvm.

Sure, @ahsonkhan. Please ping me and @rpetrusha when you're done reviewing this PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@mairaw mairaw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Made a few more changes. Please take a look.

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Contributor Author

Your changes look good @mairaw , thanks for making them.
@ahsonkhan will you have a chance to take a look at this PR today? It's one file, and the changes are repetitive, so it should be quick.

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ahsonkhan can we assume this looks good to merge?

@mairaw mairaw added waiting-on-feedback Indicates PRs that are waiting for feedback from SMEs before they can be merged and removed changes-addressed Indicates PRs that had all comments addressed and are awaiting for new review labels Aug 6, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@ahsonkhan ahsonkhan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Other than adding exception tags to document Argument OOR exceptions, the rest of the feedback are nits/questions.

Looks good otherwise.

@mairaw mairaw removed the waiting-on-feedback Indicates PRs that are waiting for feedback from SMEs before they can be merged label Aug 6, 2019
@carlossanlop carlossanlop added the changes-addressed Indicates PRs that had all comments addressed and are awaiting for new review label Aug 7, 2019
@carlossanlop
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mairaw I addressed all of Ahson's comments. He left you a couple of questions (a rewording which I decided to revert), so let me know if you'd like us to use your words instead. Does this look good to merge, if the build finishes successfully?

Copy link
Contributor

@ahsonkhan ahsonkhan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some leftover word-smithing suggestions.

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Contributor Author

I addressed all the feedback, @ahsonkhan @mairaw.

@carlossanlop carlossanlop added verify-build-before-merge and removed changes-addressed Indicates PRs that had all comments addressed and are awaiting for new review labels Aug 7, 2019
@carlossanlop
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mairaw the build completed successfully and without warnings. Can we get it merged if the last changes look good to you?

Copy link
Contributor

@ahsonkhan ahsonkhan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use an for Int16/Int32/Int64, but a UInt16/UInt32/UInt64 (consistency with existing a/an usage).

Co-Authored-By: Ahson Khan <ahkha@microsoft.com>
@carlossanlop
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mairaw build was successful and with no warnings. The last comments were addressed. Is this good to merge?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

🏁 Release: .NET Core 3.0 :checkered_flag: Release: .NET Core 3.0 new-content Indicates PRs that contain new articles

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants