Remove APP_NI_PATHS property mentions from .NET documentation#25711
Merged
AaronRobinsonMSFT merged 3 commits intomainfrom Aug 19, 2021
Merged
Remove APP_NI_PATHS property mentions from .NET documentation#25711AaronRobinsonMSFT merged 3 commits intomainfrom
APP_NI_PATHS property mentions from .NET documentation#25711AaronRobinsonMSFT merged 3 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
Member
|
Also remove from the list in: https://docs.microsoft.com/dotnet/core/tutorials/netcore-hosting#step-3---prepare-runtime-properties |
Update tutorial
APP_NI_PATHS property mentions from .NET documentation
Member
Author
|
/cc @gewarren |
elinor-fung
approved these changes
Aug 18, 2021
Co-authored-by: Genevieve Warren <24882762+gewarren@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Updating based on dotnet/runtime#57616
This property is a historical artifact from very early CoreCLR uses. It hasn't had much utility since before CoreCLR 1.0 therefore I don't see a need to document when it was respected vs removed.
/cc @vitek-karas @elinor-fung