• For SEO reasons, I would consider changing the title to What's new in .NET 5 and move evolution to the introduction. While very accurate, I don't think most customers will be searching on evolution. Searching for What's new in .NET 5 doesn't return this doc in the first couple of pages.

• .NET 5 extends these characteristics, making incremental improvements:

  Container size optimizations -> That's not an incremental improvement AFAIK. Can you provide a link to this issue or otherwise provide more information?

• What .NET 5 is not - consider What's not included in .NET 5 - My guess is that will MT better and have better SEO
  Consider changing text to: NET 5 isn't a complete replacement for .NET Framework. - After all, we want customers to migrate from .NET Framework to .NET 5, and for many it is a replacement.

• Web Forms replacement should be Blazor or Razor Pages
  There are no plans to port the following technologies from .NET Framework to .NET 5, but there are supported alternatives included in .NET 5:
  Consider changing column heading from Recommendation to something like Alternative, or recommended replacement, recommended alternative, etc.

Document Details

⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

• ID: f8175dfa-c812-afef-c018-a5927995ef43
• Version Independent ID: 4fd72a98-c51f-cbd9-0578-d6448bab4749
• Content: The evolution of .NET Core to .NET 5
• Content Source: docs/core/dotnet-five.md
• Product: dotnet-core
• GitHub Login: @IEvangelist
• Microsoft Alias: dapine