Update interactive-mode example of adding an Arcade subscription#7622
Merged
riarenas merged 1 commit intodotnet:mainfrom Jul 19, 2021
Merged
Update interactive-mode example of adding an Arcade subscription#7622riarenas merged 1 commit intodotnet:mainfrom
riarenas merged 1 commit intodotnet:mainfrom
Conversation
1 task
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To double check:
Updating
Documentation/DependencyFlowOnboarding.mdafter going through it:With the
standardMerge Policy, the Maestro++ PR check saidMaestro auto-merge - Not implemented merge policy 'standard'. Changing toStandard(like other subscriptions I see) then closing the PR and triggering a new one seems to have fixed that.I noticed
Pull Request Failure Notification Tags: ''now shows up in interactive mode, but isn't in the doc. It's fairly obvious what it does, and I left it blank, but I figured the example might as well include it.The non-interactive example appears to do something different--not sure if it's more correct or less correct than interactive. 😄 I'd personally consider removing one of the options to simplify the doc (and its maintenance).
/cc @riarenas @MattGal