Skip to content

[release/10.0] Source code updates from dotnet/dotnet (cherry-pick of #16533)#16534

Merged
JanProvaznik merged 1 commit intodotnet:release/10.0from
JanProvaznik:cherry-pick/pr-16533-to-release-10.0
Feb 19, 2026
Merged

[release/10.0] Source code updates from dotnet/dotnet (cherry-pick of #16533)#16534
JanProvaznik merged 1 commit intodotnet:release/10.0from
JanProvaznik:cherry-pick/pr-16533-to-release-10.0

Conversation

@JanProvaznik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@JanProvaznik JanProvaznik commented Feb 19, 2026

Cherry-pick of #16533 targeting release/10.0.

Excludes version number changes (eng/Version.Details.xml and global.json).

Changes included:

  • Remove VMR sha checkout steps from vmr-sync.yml
  • Add ref comment to vmr-build-pr.yml
  • Add MSBUILD_MT_ENABLED support to tools.ps1 and tools.sh
  • Add fallback reset logic to vmr-sync.ps1 and vmr-sync.sh

These scripts are used in MSBuild main which consumes arcade 10

Co-authored-by: dotnet-maestro[bot] <dotnet-maestro[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
type: github
name: dotnet/dotnet
endpoint: dotnet
ref: refs/heads/main # Set to whatever VMR branch the PR build should insert into
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's the one weird thing. Pointing to VMR main in release/10.0. But this is just a template presumably not used by anyone.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wouldn't the default be main as well? so this makes it explicit

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes the default is main but you pretty much never want to run this pipeline in release/10.0 with main VMR. Tooling repos make this a bit weird cause they consume from non main Arcade.

I don't see a better option here. Honestly, we probably want to delete this template eventually in main if no one uses it.

@JanProvaznik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

tell mode, merging

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants