Skip to content

Conversation

@njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented May 28, 2025

The current scale is too large. This PR makes it consistent with PT.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved the initialization of certain neural network parameters for enhanced stability and consistency. No changes to user-facing functionality.

Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@ustc.edu.cn>
(cherry picked from commit e88838b)
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 28, 2025 08:51
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adjusts the initialization scale of network parameters to match PyTorch’s default normalization by dividing by √(num_in + num_out).

  • Applies a scale factor of 1/√(num_in + num_out) to weight, bias, and idt initializations
  • Ensures bias and timestep (idt) follow the same scaled normal distribution
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (4)

deepmd/dpmodel/utils/network.py:118

  • [nitpick] The name idt is not immediately clear—consider renaming to timestep_bias or adding a comment explaining its purpose.
self.idt = (

deepmd/dpmodel/utils/network.py:107

  • Add a comment explaining the choice of 1/√(num_in + num_out) scaling and how it aligns with PyTorch’s initialization to aid future maintainers.
rng = np.random.default_rng(seed)

deepmd/dpmodel/utils/network.py:108

  • Add a unit test to verify that the standard deviation of the initialized weights matches the intended scale (1/√(num_in + num_out)).
self.w = rng.normal(

deepmd/dpmodel/utils/network.py:111

  • Consider initializing biases to zero instead of a random normal; many frameworks default biases to zero for faster convergence.
self.b = (

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 28, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The initialization logic for weights, biases, and identity timestep vectors in the NativeLayer constructor was updated to include a scaling factor in the normal distribution based on the input and output sizes. The rest of the constructor's logic and public interfaces remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
deepmd/dpmodel/utils/network.py Modified initialization of weights, biases, and timestep vectors to use scaled normal distribution.

Suggested labels

Python


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9d52e82 and ae7a403.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • deepmd/dpmodel/utils/network.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • deepmd/dpmodel/utils/network.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (29)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (6, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (6, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (5, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (5, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (4, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (4, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (3, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (3, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (2, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (2, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (1, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (1, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp310-manylinux_aarch64
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-win_amd64
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-macosx_arm64
  • GitHub Check: Build C++ (clang, clang)
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-macosx_x86_64
  • GitHub Check: Build C++ (rocm, rocm)
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-manylinux_x86_64
  • GitHub Check: Build C++ (cuda120, cuda)
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-manylinux_x86_64
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
  • GitHub Check: Build C++ (cuda, cuda)
  • GitHub Check: Build C library (2.14, >=2.5.0rc0,<2.15, libdeepmd_c_cu11.tar.gz)
  • GitHub Check: Test C++ (false)
  • GitHub Check: Build C++ (cpu, cpu)
  • GitHub Check: Build C library (2.18, libdeepmd_c.tar.gz)
  • GitHub Check: Test C++ (true)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (c-cpp)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d74e6b5 and 9d52e82.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • deepmd/dpmodel/utils/network.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (29)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (6, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (6, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (5, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (5, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (4, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (4, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp310-manylinux_aarch64
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (3, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Build C++ (clang, clang)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (3, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-win_amd64
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-macosx_arm64
  • GitHub Check: Build C++ (rocm, rocm)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (2, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-macosx_x86_64
  • GitHub Check: Build C++ (cuda120, cuda)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (2, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-manylinux_x86_64
  • GitHub Check: Build C++ (cuda, cuda)
  • GitHub Check: Build C library (2.14, >=2.5.0rc0,<2.15, libdeepmd_c_cu11.tar.gz)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
  • GitHub Check: Test C++ (false)
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-manylinux_x86_64
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (1, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Build C++ (cpu, cpu)
  • GitHub Check: Build C library (2.18, libdeepmd_c.tar.gz)
  • GitHub Check: Test C++ (true)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (1, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (c-cpp)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <njzjz@qq.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 28, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.79%. Comparing base (d74e6b5) to head (ae7a403).
⚠️ Report is 88 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            devel    #4774   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.79%   84.79%           
=======================================
  Files         698      698           
  Lines       67746    67747    +1     
  Branches     3540     3540           
=======================================
+ Hits        57444    57446    +2     
  Misses       9171     9171           
+ Partials     1131     1130    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@njzjz njzjz requested a review from wanghan-iapcm May 28, 2025 17:27
@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm added this pull request to the merge queue May 30, 2025
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:devel with commit 9c17b96 May 30, 2025
60 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants