Skip to content

Conversation

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Contributor

Ideally I still think these methods should be part of an intermediate results class along the lines of #525, but even in parser they are nicely focused.

@pganssle pganssle self-requested a review December 5, 2017 16:51
@pganssle pganssle added this to the Feature release milestone Dec 5, 2017
@pganssle
Copy link
Member

pganssle commented Dec 5, 2017

No immediate objections here.

Copy link
Member

@pganssle pganssle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No objections. I think the last of the sprint PRs that might have had some effect on this are in, so maybe rebase and I'll merge?

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Contributor Author

If this goes in I can follow-up with a PR to get test coverage for the one line that is missed.

@pganssle pganssle merged commit d4a33b0 into dateutil:master Dec 10, 2017
@pganssle pganssle mentioned this pull request Mar 11, 2018
@pganssle pganssle modified the milestones: Feature release, 2.7.0 Apr 23, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants