Skip to content

Update link to RFC 2445 / RFC 5545 #543

@pganssle

Description

@pganssle

Currently we link to the .txt version of RFC 2445, but the rich text version has better links and navigation.

I would probably change the link in rrule to link to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5545 instead. Technically this is not quite right, since we're mostly based on RFC 2445, but since I'm intending to eventually support RFC 5545, we can accept that all deficiencies in our implementation are bugs, not intended behavior.

A few other places to update to refer to RFC 5545 instead of RFC 2445:

To do list:

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions