Conversation
| assert (sorted(dd.from_bcolz(t, chunksize=2).dask) != | ||
| sorted(dd.from_bcolz(t, chunksize=3).dask)) | ||
|
|
||
| threads = [] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
FYI @mrocklin, this change was because the old style failed to ever raise an exception for me, even with
def check():
assert 0The exception would happen in the other thread, but would fail to cause an exception in the main test process.
|
Nevermind, 466e51e won't work, since it breaks everything else :/ like |
11be741 to
b237ee1
Compare
253a403 to
c93dd49
Compare
|
OK, this should be good on the dask side of things. This worker was against pandas dev (https://travis-ci.org/dask/dask/jobs/283696522#L645) as of about 14 hours ago. Earlier this morning, pandas-dev/pandas#17779 was merged, which will make the only failing test pass. At this point, I think I'll revert the change adding a pandas-dev worker, and just leave the compatibility changes? |
421e2c6 to
564f46a
Compare
|
@mrocklin should be good to go. |
|
Thanks Tom!
…On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Tom Augspurger ***@***.***> wrote:
@mrocklin <https://github.com/mrocklin> should be good to go.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2737 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AASszDxBzxuFEmp4PRRIZC3X2UPFAGyJks5spSV0gaJpZM4PsmvU>
.
|
Each commit has the compatability change for a specific change in pandas.
This will fail for now because of pandas-dev/pandas#17767 and pandas-dev/pandas#16821. That will take me a little while longer to debug (short story: pandas is more consistent about dtype casting. I think pandas is doing the correct thing here.)
closes #2736