Skip to content

A couple of dask-expr fixes for new parquet cache#10880

Merged
phofl merged 4 commits intodask:mainfrom
fjetter:parquet_singleton_fixes
Feb 2, 2024
Merged

A couple of dask-expr fixes for new parquet cache#10880
phofl merged 4 commits intodask:mainfrom
fjetter:parquet_singleton_fixes

Conversation

@fjetter
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@fjetter fjetter commented Feb 1, 2024

This is required for dask/dask-expr#798

I haven't really tried to understand why the one test now no longer deviates. I guess the previous deviation was a caching bug and the cache in dask/dask-expr#798 is a little more specific.

Note: This one test will now fail on the dask-expr test branch until dask/dask-expr#798 is merged as well

@fjetter fjetter changed the title A couple of dask-expr fixes for parquet A couple of dask-expr fixes for new parquet cache in dask-expr Feb 1, 2024
@fjetter fjetter changed the title A couple of dask-expr fixes for new parquet cache in dask-expr A couple of dask-expr fixes for new parquet cache Feb 1, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 1, 2024

Unit Test Results

See test report for an extended history of previous test failures. This is useful for diagnosing flaky tests.

     15 files  ± 0       15 suites  ±0   3h 10m 12s ⏱️ - 1m 50s
 12 985 tests + 1   12 054 ✅ ± 0     929 💤 ±0  2 ❌ +1 
160 200 runs  +11  143 625 ✅ +10  16 573 💤 ±0  2 ❌ +1 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 6758d14. ± Comparison against base commit 0eab32e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Comment on lines +191 to +192
def __dask_tokenize__(self):
return tokenize(self.name, self.keys)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this should include the type as well

@phofl phofl merged commit daf1f7c into dask:main Feb 2, 2024
@phofl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

phofl commented Feb 2, 2024

thx

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants