run_shell_command() with check=True to avoid silent failures#343
Closed
run_shell_command() with check=True to avoid silent failures#343
run_shell_command() with check=True to avoid silent failures#343Conversation
aaronliu0130
requested changes
Mar 17, 2025
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
cpplint is supposed to have a return code of 1 when it collects any error from the input files. There is no problem nor typo here.
In fact the return code is already checked against the expected return code in the .def file in check_def(), which would throw an uncaught OSError if the given .def file was not found.
Member
Author
|
Thanks for clarifying... Closing. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
%
ruff rule PLW1510# https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/subprocess-run-without-checkWe have 17 silent failures in our tests.