-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 806
[2025-06 CWG Motion 1] Core Language Working Group "ready" Issues for the June, 2025 meeting #7985
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@jensmaurer: any idea what I'm doing wrong with the xrefdelta? |
|
Hm... Strange. Looks correct to me. Rebuilding locally for a deeper look. |
|
Reproduced locally. This tag doesn't exist in xrefprev, so it's flagged. (We've moved xrefprev back to ~2003 or so.) |
|
Ah yes, of course, thanks! |
21c67ed to
649e55b
Compare
649e55b to
091e463
Compare
|
Thanks, Jens! |
091e463 to
0d7a7e6
Compare
Editorial note: The new example is placed after an existing note, even though the wording places it right after the added normative text.
Wording reconciled with earlier CWG3015.
0d7a7e6 to
bfa04ab
Compare
Fixes #7926.
Fixes cplusplus/papers#2377
Also fixes cplusplus/papers#1736