Skip to content

Splitting of electronic states due to spin-orbit coupling#2831

Merged
oschuett merged 48 commits intocp2k:masterfrom
JWilhelm:master
Jun 23, 2023
Merged

Splitting of electronic states due to spin-orbit coupling#2831
oschuett merged 48 commits intocp2k:masterfrom
JWilhelm:master

Conversation

@JWilhelm
Copy link
Member

The SOC parameters from Hartwigsen, Goedecker, Hutter (https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.58.3641), Eq. 18, 19 + Table I, are used to compute the spin-orbit shift of electronic states (see Eq. 11 in https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0953-8984/25/10/105503).

If this PR is too close to the release, I am also happy to postpone.

JWilhelm and others added 30 commits June 19, 2023 22:56
…nalization in parallel unfortunately does not work any more, there is a segfault
NVP | 1 2 !8
Alpha GW direct gap !9
Beta GW direct gap !9
GW+SOC bandgap (eV) !4
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You also need to increment the counter on the first line when adding a new test type.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, Ole!

@oschuett
Copy link
Member

Unfortunately, the CI jobs keep getting preempted right now...

@JWilhelm
Copy link
Member Author

@oschuett Thanks for having a look at this PR. The conventions seem to fail because of a missing initialization in exstates_types.F which has not been touched by this PR. Do you think there is still something to do to concerning this PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants