Skip to content

Generalize linter calling via pre-commit#1195

Merged
pydanny merged 1 commit intocookiecutter:masterfrom
ssbarnea:pre-commit
Jul 28, 2019
Merged

Generalize linter calling via pre-commit#1195
pydanny merged 1 commit intocookiecutter:masterfrom
ssbarnea:pre-commit

Conversation

@ssbarnea
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

  • enable chaining multiple linters via pre-commit tool.
  • fixes several trailing newlines
  • removes few incorrect +x modes on files
  • adds few extra checks
  • renames flake8 tox environment to 'lint' to avoid confusions
  • fixes docs/conf.py style so we do not need more flake8 excludes

@ssbarnea ssbarnea self-assigned this Jul 23, 2019
@ssbarnea ssbarnea added the needs-review PR Only: This PR require review from other developer label Jul 23, 2019
@ssbarnea ssbarnea force-pushed the pre-commit branch 2 times, most recently from 422a700 to 906e97b Compare July 23, 2019 18:53
@codecov-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-io commented Jul 23, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1195 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #1195   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage     100%    100%           
======================================
  Files          18      18           
  Lines         783     783           
======================================
  Hits          783     783

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1c547ee...94888c7. Read the comment docs.

* enable chaining multiple linters via pre-commit tool.
* fixes several trailing newlines
* removes few incorrect +x modes on files
* adds few extra checks
* renames flake8 tox environment to 'lint' to avoid confusions
* fixes docs/conf.py style so we do not need more flake8 excludes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs-review PR Only: This PR require review from other developer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants