Skip to content

CI: Quadlet rootfs test: use container image as rootfs#24019

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intocontainers:mainfrom
edsantiago:quadlet-rootfs-fix
Sep 20, 2024
Merged

CI: Quadlet rootfs test: use container image as rootfs#24019
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intocontainers:mainfrom
edsantiago:quadlet-rootfs-fix

Conversation

@edsantiago
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Test was written to use / (root). This is not parallel-safe.

Fixes: #23909

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago santiago@redhat.com

None

Test was written to use / (root). This is not parallel-safe.

Fixes: containers#23909

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added release-note-none approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Sep 19, 2024
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ygalblum ygalblum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 20, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: edsantiago, ygalblum

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [edsantiago,ygalblum]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Comment on lines 724 to 725
skip_if_no_selinux
skip_if_rootless
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am somewhat sure these can be removed now?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wouldn't the mounts need complicated unshare? Would those work inside quadlet?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah right yes you would need to use unshare rootless but yes as they all share the same userns the mounts should work with quadlet. Anyway I guess it is not really important to test it rootless. (although I do not get the no_selinux skip either)

I guess I just merge it as it is the same as before

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 20, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit f7be7a3 into containers:main Sep 20, 2024
@edsantiago edsantiago deleted the quadlet-rootfs-fix branch September 23, 2024 12:25
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Dec 23, 2024
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 23, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

race: system df: failed to get read/write size of container: /proc/something: ENOENT or EINVAL

3 participants