In the client we use the term "RootFS` when referring to snapshots. This is confusing terminology, we should refer to a rootfs as either a set of mounts to create a rootfs or a directory which can be used as a rootfs. In the client we should use the term snapshots to refer to any identifier which is to be used with a snapshotter.
Naming might look like...
WithSnapshot - would take in existing snapshotWithNewSnapshot - formerly WithNewRootFS (could also be called WithNewActiveSnapshot?)WithNewSnapshotView - formerly WithNewReadonlyRootFSWithRootFS - would take in mounts and use them directlyWithRootFSPath - would take in local directory to bind mount as rootfs
In the client we use the term "RootFS` when referring to snapshots. This is confusing terminology, we should refer to a rootfs as either a set of mounts to create a rootfs or a directory which can be used as a rootfs. In the client we should use the term snapshots to refer to any identifier which is to be used with a snapshotter.
Naming might look like...
WithSnapshot- would take in existing snapshotWithNewSnapshot- formerlyWithNewRootFS(could also be calledWithNewActiveSnapshot?)WithNewSnapshotView- formerlyWithNewReadonlyRootFSWithRootFS- would take in mounts and use them directlyWithRootFSPath- would take in local directory to bind mount as rootfs