I'm working on a project that uses indicatif, and I'm trying to add testcontainers-rs for testing. Both crates can compile to WebAssembly even though my project is not targeting WebAssembly.
Unfortunately, each crate pulls in a different version of the WebAssembly toolchain, and since only one WebAssembly linker can exist in a source tree, this causes a conflict that prevents me from using both crates together.
It would be helpful if indicatif made its WebAssembly support optional behind a feature flag, similar to how chrono handles it.
Thanks :)
I'm working on a project that uses
indicatif, and I'm trying to addtestcontainers-rsfor testing. Both crates can compile to WebAssembly even though my project is not targeting WebAssembly.Unfortunately, each crate pulls in a different version of the WebAssembly toolchain, and since only one WebAssembly linker can exist in a source tree, this causes a conflict that prevents me from using both crates together.
It would be helpful if
indicatifmade its WebAssembly support optional behind a feature flag, similar to howchronohandles it.Thanks :)