Merge Queue: Allow specifying separate status checks for the merge queue #47548
Replies: 6 comments
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
-
|
Hi, I was just going to give the same feedback. We have a lot different checks that target different scenarios. We're deveolping Ansible Collections and most checks are only useful when the targeted code has been changed. But before finally merging into Maybe this helps to give an extra point of view. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'd also like separate required checks for pull requests and merge queues. Use case 1: Publishing documentation to
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Same for us, using Drone CI. Unfortunately, Drone server doesn't yet accept the We are able to bypass this issue by triggering builds to run on What we would like is to be able to set merge queues checks separately from the pull requests checks, so the merge queues are agnostic to the CI tool everyone uses. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Up. Same issue. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Bump. My specific scenario is that I would like a long-running verification to always run against the PR, but only be required to get past the MQ. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Select Topic Area
Product Feedback
Body
We've been trying out the new merge queue feature, and discovered one of our required external status checks (https://cla-assistant.io/) never runs for the merge queue. Sample screenshot below:

It would be useful if there was a way to define which status checks are required for a merge queue, and which are for PRs only. We could easily drop several of the status checks here (such as publishing), as those are already ran either pre-merge or post-merge.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions