Merged
Conversation
.. and some constructors
For now the mapping to human-readable names done straight in template..
.. assuming spammers don't use screen readers?
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Display link to the workflow's declared license. If none is declared, check for
LICENSEorLICENSE.txt.Motivation and Context
As pointed out in #183 we don't render the license. From #180 this uses
schema:licensewith a fallback todoap:licenseanddcterms:license, assuming it is a URI.How Has This Been Tested?
Tested with workflows:
Screenshots (if appropriate):
In same order:
Types of changes
Checklist: