@cason and I decided today on the following:

• Daniel will rewrite the Context section (in particular Technical context) to describe the two possible implementations that exist towards solving the problem of local state sync
  • Context: Daniel noticed that the present ADR sets the context, problem, and solution differently than the candidate solution in Enable local snapshot restore (backport: #733) #728
• Later today, latest Monday, we'll discuss with the rest of the team to understand the tradeoffs between the two candidate solutions. The goal is to get advice and land on a decision regarding which of the two solutions is preferable.
  • Intuitively, the solution in Enable local snapshot restore (backport: #733) #728 is simpler and more direct; the present ADR hints at a solution that may be more maintainable, but more difficult to implement and test
• After we decide on which solution to adopt, we update the present ADR, in particular the Decision and subsequent sections
• In the meantime, we'll be looking to test the solution in Enable local snapshot restore (backport: #733) #728 with help from contributors

Thank you for the notes.

1. Should we hold until more architectural decisions are made? If you think reviewing a working implementation for Juno v14 is helpful, we can update all the code. But it won't be possible to target main since Juno still targets v0.34
2. Can decide whether we are targeting v0.34 or main?

Thanks for the quick feedback!

If you think reviewing a working implementation for Juno v14 is helpful, we can update all the code. But it won't be possible to target main since Juno still targets v0.34
Can decide whether we are targeting v0.34 or main?

It would be helpful to have instructions on how to use the solution in #728 in Juno (or other live network). Thanks in advance for that! I think targeting v0.34 should be fine.

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

So, for context see: #28 (comment)

Superseded by #801