Skip to content

spec/consensus: Investigate Delta State Based CRDT #751

@lasarojc

Description

@lasarojc

State based CRDT may use too much bandwidth as it transfers the whole state at every 1-1 synchronization.
Transferring only deltas of state changes may be more efficient, but requires tracking more metadata in the state, which may be fine in general buy maybe overkill for our use (all (height, round, signer) tuples have at most one version).

In this task we investigate and determine if delta state based CRDT is to be used or if another approach is more adequate.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

backlogA prioritized task in the team's backlog

Type

No type

Projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions