Skip to content

"blueish" correction in wrong dictionary #3509

@hadess

Description

@hadess

Commit fbb964f added blueish to the usage dictionary. I'm not sure why it ended up there, doesn't seem to have anything to do with terminology RFC draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-knodel-terminology/)

Maybe it should be in dictionary_rare.txt ?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    dictionaryChanges to the dictionary

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions