Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Seb Julliand <sjulliand@arcadsoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: Seb Julliand <sjulliand@arcadsoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: worksofliam <mrliamallan@live.co.uk>
Contributor
|
👋 A new build is available for this PR based on 88c1c39. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Looks like there is a bug with our node library. We have an instance when an IBM i system is not setup correctly, then SIGABRT is thrown, but the
codeis still0- which in most of the extension, indicates success.I've added some logic to our statement executor to set the code to
127whenSIGABRTis thrown.I have also added a page in the docs to track this issue (which we've now seen a couple of times in the wild, but we are still unsure of the cause): https://codefori.github.io/docs/tips/setup/#qsh--cqsh-returning-sigabrt