This change is 

What coverage would we lose if we just did >= expected, rather than having the 5% overage upper bound on what we allow? Just thinking a really slow/overloaded CI could see lots of elastic resumes

What coverage would we lose if we just did >= expected

I don't think we really lose any coverage. I updated the test so that we just assert the lower bound.

bors r+

Build succeeded:

• Bazel Essential CI (Cockroach)

Encountered an error creating backports. Some common things that can go wrong:

1. The backport branch might have already existed.
2. There was a merge conflict.
3. The backport branch contained merge commits.

You might need to create your backport manually using the backport tool.

error creating merge commit from 149ad11 to blathers/backport-release-22.2-108942: POST https://api.github.com/repos/cockroachdb/cockroach/merges: 409 Merge conflict []

you may need to manually resolve merge conflicts with the backport tool.

Backport to branch 22.2.x failed. See errors above.

error creating merge commit from 149ad11 to blathers/backport-release-23.1-108942: POST https://api.github.com/repos/cockroachdb/cockroach/merges: 409 Merge conflict []

you may need to manually resolve merge conflicts with the backport tool.

Backport to branch 23.1.x failed. See errors above.

_{🦉 Hoot! I am a Blathers, a bot for CockroachDB. My owner is dev-inf.}