Question: Should we be counting resources from relations under the total count? #114
Description
We count the total number of resources including relations:
Line 203 in b45c12e
However when we print it we use the top level table name:
Line 180 in b45c12e
Which can be confusing as if the user takes the name of the table from the logs and run a count on the database, they might experience a different number of resources.
Should we only consider top level resources in the count? Maybe find a better way to print the count?