Skip to content

Conversation

@disq
Copy link
Member

@disq disq commented Jul 11, 2024

tables command unnecessarily requires a full spec (at least one destination), but we have a relaxed spec reader now, implemented for the test-connection command some time ago.

@disq disq requested review from a team and erezrokah and removed request for a team July 11, 2024 09:35
@disq disq changed the title fix: Allow tables command to be run with a single spec fix: Allow tables command to be run with a single-plugin spec Jul 11, 2024
@disq disq added the automerge Automatically merge once required checks pass label Jul 11, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 0ed62e5 into main Jul 11, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the fix/allow-tables-to-be-run-with-single-spec branch July 11, 2024 09:51
kodiakhq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2024
…ec (#18571)

#### Summary

Similar to #18542, so you can install a single plugin without linking it to a destination/source
kodiakhq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


## [5.25.1](cli-v5.25.0...cli-v5.25.1) (2024-07-15)


### Bug Fixes

* Allow `plugin install` command to be run with a single-plugin spec ([#18571](#18571)) ([4c15f86](4c15f86))
* Allow `tables` command to be run with a single-plugin spec ([#18542](#18542)) ([0ed62e5](0ed62e5))
* **deps:** Update module github.com/cloudquery/plugin-sdk/v4 to v4.49.2 ([#18504](#18504)) ([2d80936](2d80936))
* **deps:** Update module github.com/cloudquery/plugin-sdk/v4 to v4.49.3 ([#18513](#18513)) ([d12da90](d12da90))

---
This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
kodiakhq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/cli automerge Automatically merge once required checks pass

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants