Skip to content

Support hasql-1.8#345

Merged
TeofilC merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
wip/teo/hasql-1.8
Oct 9, 2024
Merged

Support hasql-1.8#345
TeofilC merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
wip/teo/hasql-1.8

Conversation

@TeofilC
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@TeofilC TeofilC commented Oct 6, 2024

No description provided.

@TeofilC TeofilC mentioned this pull request Oct 6, 2024
@TeofilC TeofilC force-pushed the wip/teo/hasql-1.8 branch from 9555149 to 977ea2e Compare October 8, 2024 17:12
@TeofilC TeofilC marked this pull request as ready for review October 8, 2024 17:13
@TeofilC TeofilC force-pushed the wip/teo/hasql-1.8 branch from 977ea2e to 9b0d5cc Compare October 8, 2024 17:13
The IP type was changed in hasql-1.8. Rather than forcing a breaking
change, we export instances for both the old and new types.

Resolves #341
@TeofilC TeofilC force-pushed the wip/teo/hasql-1.8 branch from 9b0d5cc to bc057ab Compare October 8, 2024 17:20
@TeofilC TeofilC changed the title Draft: support hasql-1.8 Support hasql-1.8 Oct 8, 2024
@TeofilC
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

TeofilC commented Oct 8, 2024

This should be ready for review now. I'm not sure if/how I should run ch-hs-import on these.

I've vendored the logic for parsing IP addresses and made it so we support both the old and new IP package

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ocharles ocharles left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks! We should cut a release soon I think!

@TeofilC
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

TeofilC commented Oct 9, 2024

We should cut a release soon I think!

Sounds good! We should see if #331 is ready soon as well, since I think we use that internally

@TeofilC TeofilC merged commit 8295bd1 into master Oct 9, 2024
@TeofilC TeofilC deleted the wip/teo/hasql-1.8 branch October 9, 2024 14:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants