Skip to content

[WIP] Test upgrade#25946

Closed
jschwinger233 wants to merge 6 commits intocilium:mainfrom
jschwinger233:test-upgrade
Closed

[WIP] Test upgrade#25946
jschwinger233 wants to merge 6 commits intocilium:mainfrom
jschwinger233:test-upgrade

Conversation

@jschwinger233
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes: #issue-number

<!-- Enter the release note text here if needed or remove this section! -->

brb and others added 2 commits June 5, 2023 15:03
Signed-off-by: Martynas Pumputis <m@lambda.lt>
Signed-off-by: Zhichuan Liang <gray.liang@isovalent.com>
@maintainer-s-little-helper maintainer-s-little-helper Bot added the dont-merge/needs-release-note-label The author needs to describe the release impact of these changes. label Jun 6, 2023
@jschwinger233
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/ci-e2e

Signed-off-by: Zhichuan Liang <gray.liang@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: gray <gray.liang@isovalent.com>
@jschwinger233
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/ci-e2e

Comment thread bpf/init.sh Outdated
echo ">>>>>>>>>> $STALE_IP6_HOST"
if [ "$STALE_IP6_HOST" != "<nil>" ]; then
ip -6 addr del $STALE_IP6_HOST dev $HOST_DEV1
fi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@brb Martynas, we can either delete the stale ipv6 here at init.sh or (see the other comment below)

args[initArgStaleIPv6NodeIP] = addr.IPNet.IP.String()
break
}
}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or we delete the stale ipv6 here, when we generate the new ipv6 for cilium_host.

Which one do you prefer? For me, deleting stale ipv6 at init.sh seems to be more cohesive, as that will be the only place we change the cilium_host's ipv6, but we have to pass an additional shell argument.

(There are other options, like deleting when installing ipv6 routes, but that's way too in-cohesive, so I ditched those ideas.)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As we are migrating from bpf/init.sh, I'd suggest to delete it here.

Signed-off-by: gray <gray.liang@isovalent.com>
@jschwinger233
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/ci-e2e

@jschwinger233
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/ci-e2e

Signed-off-by: gray <gray.liang@isovalent.com>
@jschwinger233
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/ci-e2e

@jschwinger233
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Cilium Conformance E2E turns green, it appears our patch from #25962 is working.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dont-merge/needs-release-note-label The author needs to describe the release impact of these changes.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants