policy/api: Rework Rule.MarshalJSON() to ease maintainability#11651
Merged
policy/api: Rework Rule.MarshalJSON() to ease maintainability#11651
Conversation
aanm
requested changes
May 25, 2020
d61a72f to
a390a6f
Compare
a390a6f to
621b5d7
Compare
Instead of listing all fields of Rule manually, use type embedding. Co-authored-by: André Martins <andre@cilium.io> Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul@cilium.io>
621b5d7 to
78dbf4f
Compare
Member
Author
|
test-me-please |
Member
Author
|
@aanm I've updated with your diff and added you as co-author to the commit. Please take a look. |
Member
|
test-me-please |
Member
Author
|
retest-runtime |
Member
Author
34 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Instead of listing all fields of
Rulemanually, usereflect.@aanm What do you think of this approach?