scopes - https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se8/html/jls-6.html#jls-6.3
"public, protected, and private" are called as "access modifiers" - https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se8/html/jls-6.html#jls-6.6
https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/blob/master/src/main/java/com/puppycrawl/tools/checkstyle/api/Scope.java
contains "access modifiers" and scope level (anoninner).
Two separate terms are in one class ....... and even in API class ... .
scope - http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/property_types.html#scope
Scope was added at far history, 17d3b31
TODO:
- break API and make new enum/class - AccessModifier . That have only access modifiers.
- Scope should be moved our of API and contain anoninner only. It might be used for other scopes in future or removed completely from sources to be util method
booelan isInAnnoiousInnerClass(ast)
issue is good candidate for checkstyle8 version.
usage of Scope enum:
scopes - https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se8/html/jls-6.html#jls-6.3
"public, protected, and private" are called as "access modifiers" - https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se8/html/jls-6.html#jls-6.6
https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/blob/master/src/main/java/com/puppycrawl/tools/checkstyle/api/Scope.java
contains "access modifiers" and scope level (anoninner).
Two separate terms are in one class ....... and even in API class ... .
scope - http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/property_types.html#scope
Scope was added at far history, 17d3b31
TODO:
booelan isInAnnoiousInnerClass(ast)issue is good candidate for checkstyle8 version.
usage of Scope enum:
