Skip to content

feat: support having a custom error handler#28

Merged
caarlos0 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
errorhandler
Jun 18, 2025
Merged

feat: support having a custom error handler#28
caarlos0 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
errorhandler

Conversation

@caarlos0
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

for the cases you want to extract more information from the error before printing it, or just print it differently.

@caarlos0 caarlos0 requested review from Copilot and meowgorithm June 18, 2025 18:53
@caarlos0 caarlos0 self-assigned this Jun 18, 2025
@caarlos0 caarlos0 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 18, 2025
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds support for a custom error handler to allow users to extract more information from errors before printing or to print them differently.

  • Introduces an ErrorHandler type and its default implementation (DefaultErrorHandler) in fang.go.
  • Adds a WithErrorHandler option to override the default behavior.
  • Updates the help output and adds a test in fang_test.go to validate the custom error handler functionality.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File Description
testdata/TestSetup/custom_error_handler.golden Adds a golden file with the expected custom error message output
help.go Replaces the internal writeError with the new DefaultErrorHandler function
fang_test.go Introduces a test case that verifies custom error handler functionality
fang.go Defines the ErrorHandler type, a default handler, and the WithErrorHandler option

@caarlos0 caarlos0 merged commit c14108d into main Jun 18, 2025
18 checks passed
@caarlos0 caarlos0 deleted the errorhandler branch June 18, 2025 19:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants