Skip to content

Conversation

@rudymatela
Copy link

@rudymatela rudymatela commented Jul 14, 2022

Closes: #77?

First explorations on implementing a merge train:

  • the "candidate" maybe is now a "candidates" list
  • the integration status includes the parent PR

I am not sure if this is the right way to go at the end, hence the junk/ prefix in the branch name. I am thinking of perhaps eliminating the concept of a list of candidates altogether, and infer this fact from the collection of PRs.

Support multiple candidates with pointers to parents.

This typechecks but tests fail.
@rudymatela rudymatela self-assigned this Jul 14, 2022
@rudymatela rudymatela added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 14, 2022
This was referenced Jul 14, 2022
@rudymatela
Copy link
Author

Closing this in favour of #131 (and #134).

@rudymatela rudymatela closed this Jul 19, 2022
@rudymatela rudymatela deleted the junk/merge-train/candidates-with-parents branch July 19, 2022 08:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Merge train

1 participant