rbd: add rbd_snap_remove_by_id #1187
Conversation
|
This pull request now has conflicts with the target branch. |
f49a7d1 to
5fbce6b
Compare
|
Thanks @anoopcs9 and @phlogistonjohn! Fixed the test-case and solved the merge conflicts in the api-status. |
anoopcs9
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Probably replace librbd:rbd_snap_remove_by_id in the commit message (Add librbd:rbd_snap_remove_by_id to the API status) to RemoveSnapByID to reflect the new go-ceph API than the underlying C API?
| "github.com/stretchr/testify/assert" | ||
| "github.com/stretchr/testify/require" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think, for this test case, we only need either assert or require.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't see using both as an issue: assert sets the test as failed but keeps going; require stops the test then and there if it fails. both have their uses. but I'm not objecting to simplifying it either.
| "github.com/stretchr/testify/assert" | ||
| "github.com/stretchr/testify/require" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't see using both as an issue: assert sets the test as failed but keeps going; require stops the test then and there if it fails. both have their uses. but I'm not objecting to simplifying it either.
5fbce6b to
3235909
Compare
@anoopcs9, I've updated the commit message. Please have a look again, thanks! |
Pull request has been modified.
|
@Mergifyio rebase |
Image.RemoveSnapByID removes an existing snapshot. This can be used to manually remove a snapshot from the trash. Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@ibm.com>
The librbd:rbd_snap_remove_by_id function is implemented by Image.RemoveSnapByID inside the rbd package. Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@ibm.com>
✅ Branch has been successfully rebased |
3235909 to
137ff3d
Compare
Image.RemoveSnapByID removes an existing snapshot. This can be used to
manually remove a snapshot from the trash.
Closes: #1183