Conversation
|
Sloppy bash check failed from: |
|
The x86_64 container check failed with: |
| elif [[ "${CEPH_VERSION}" == reef ]]; then \ | ||
| echo "[ganesha]" > /etc/yum.repos.d/ganesha.repo ; \ | ||
| echo "name=ganesha" >> /etc/yum.repos.d/ganesha.repo ; \ | ||
| echo "baseurl=https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/\$releasever/storage/\$basearch/nfsganesha-5/" >> /etc/yum.repos.d/ganesha.repo ; \ | ||
| echo "gpgcheck=0" >> /etc/yum.repos.d/ganesha.repo ; \ | ||
| echo "enabled=1" >> /etc/yum.repos.d/ganesha.repo ; \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Here's where we define the nfs-ganesha version
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We verified in a reef container that nfs-ganesha v5.2 is used:
[root@3a5f3c37ef30 /]# ganesha.nfsd -version
NFS-Ganesha Release = V5.2
The filepath defined here leads to:
https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/8-stream/storage/x86_64/nfsganesha-5/Packages/n/
https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/8-stream/storage/aarch64/nfsganesha-5/Packages/n/
|
x86_64 check failed from: |
|
Looks like this test is failing on other PRs too, so it's not caused by anything in this PR specifically. |
indeed, this has nothing to do |
|
@guits is this check required to merge the PR? |
This add the required changes in order to build Ceph Reef container images. Signed-off-by: Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Laura Flores <lflores@redhat.com>
not really although I would prefer this test passes before merging but I get we are late in publishing the RC so we can discard it. |
BlaineEXE
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This all looks good to me. Just one extremely small note that probably isn't worth changing in this PR.
| echo "[ganesha]" > /etc/yum.repos.d/ganesha.repo ; \ | ||
| echo "name=ganesha" >> /etc/yum.repos.d/ganesha.repo ; \ | ||
| echo "baseurl=https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/\$releasever-stream/storage/\$basearch/nfsganesha-5/" >> /etc/yum.repos.d/ganesha.repo ; \ | ||
| echo "gpgcheck=0" >> /etc/yum.repos.d/ganesha.repo ; \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm pretty sure buildlogs.centos.org repos support gpg signing, but this is a very small nit.
|
FWIW, I'm seeing the same demo cluster failure in this PR I'm working on: https://github.com/ceph/ceph-container/actions/runs/5137111619/jobs/9265592076?pr=2102 Update: We "resolved" this in Rook by creating RGW pools with the min allowable number of PGs (I think that's 8 by default) before deploying RGWs: rook/rook#5098 That's the RGW root pool (.rgw.root), the RGW metadata pool, and the RGW data pool. I think the all the standard pools would be |
|
Thank you @BlaineEXE ! |
This add the required changes in order to build Ceph Reef
container images.