Skip to content

common/Formatter: use CachedStackStringStream for efficiency#57392

Merged
batrick merged 1 commit intoceph:mainfrom
batrick:formatter-css
May 23, 2024
Merged

common/Formatter: use CachedStackStringStream for efficiency#57392
batrick merged 1 commit intoceph:mainfrom
batrick:formatter-css

Conversation

@batrick
Copy link
Member

@batrick batrick commented May 10, 2024

A stringstream is incredibly expensive to construct, use a cached one.

Contribution Guidelines

  • To sign and title your commits, please refer to Submitting Patches to Ceph.

  • If you are submitting a fix for a stable branch (e.g. "quincy"), please refer to Submitting Patches to Ceph - Backports for the proper workflow.

  • When filling out the below checklist, you may click boxes directly in the GitHub web UI. When entering or editing the entire PR message in the GitHub web UI editor, you may also select a checklist item by adding an x between the brackets: [x]. Spaces and capitalization matter when checking off items this way.

Checklist

  • Tracker (select at least one)
    • References tracker ticket
    • Very recent bug; references commit where it was introduced
    • New feature (ticket optional)
    • Doc update (no ticket needed)
    • Code cleanup (no ticket needed)
  • Component impact
    • Affects Dashboard, opened tracker ticket
    • Affects Orchestrator, opened tracker ticket
    • No impact that needs to be tracked
  • Documentation (select at least one)
    • Updates relevant documentation
    • No doc update is appropriate
  • Tests (select at least one)
Show available Jenkins commands
  • jenkins retest this please
  • jenkins test classic perf
  • jenkins test crimson perf
  • jenkins test signed
  • jenkins test make check
  • jenkins test make check arm64
  • jenkins test submodules
  • jenkins test dashboard
  • jenkins test dashboard cephadm
  • jenkins test api
  • jenkins test docs
  • jenkins render docs
  • jenkins test ceph-volume all
  • jenkins test ceph-volume tox
  • jenkins test windows
  • jenkins test rook e2e

@batrick
Copy link
Member Author

batrick commented May 10, 2024

jenkins test api

@batrick
Copy link
Member Author

batrick commented May 10, 2024

jenkins test make check

@batrick
Copy link
Member Author

batrick commented May 10, 2024

jenkins test make check arm64

Copy link
Contributor

@rzarzynski rzarzynski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally LGTM. Just some minors.

A stringstream is incredibly expensive to construct, use a cached one.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@redhat.com>
@batrick
Copy link
Member Author

batrick commented May 15, 2024

jenkins test make check

@batrick
Copy link
Member Author

batrick commented May 15, 2024

jenkins test make check arm64

@batrick
Copy link
Member Author

batrick commented May 15, 2024

jenkins test api

1 similar comment
@batrick
Copy link
Member Author

batrick commented May 15, 2024

jenkins test api

@batrick batrick requested a review from rzarzynski May 16, 2024 12:37
@batrick
Copy link
Member Author

batrick commented May 17, 2024

This PR is under test in https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/66086.

@batrick batrick merged commit 6b2942f into ceph:main May 23, 2024
@batrick batrick deleted the formatter-css branch May 23, 2024 01:16
@sebastian-philipp
Copy link
Contributor

sebastian-philipp commented May 24, 2024

Morning @batrick . I think https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/66215 is loosely related?

@sajibreadd
Copy link
Member

Is there any backport tracker created for this PR?

@sebastian-philipp
Copy link
Contributor

Is there any backport tracker created for this PR?

not sure, it's not a bug fix?

@sajibreadd
Copy link
Member

not sure, it's not a bug fix?

My PR #57695 uses CachedStackStream as it is only used in the main branch. reef is still using stringstream. As we need this change in reef, so should we cherry-pick both commit or handle this separately after cherry-pick only my commit?

@batrick
Copy link
Member Author

batrick commented May 28, 2024

You can backport this commit with #57695 to avoid conflicts. I had not intended to do so since this is mostly a cleanup.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants