Skip to content

mds: fix the description for inotable testing only options#52024

Merged
rishabh-d-dave merged 1 commit intoceph:mainfrom
lxbsz:wip-61660
Apr 26, 2024
Merged

mds: fix the description for inotable testing only options#52024
rishabh-d-dave merged 1 commit intoceph:mainfrom
lxbsz:wip-61660

Conversation

@lxbsz
Copy link
Member

@lxbsz lxbsz commented Jun 13, 2023

The description text are mixed for mds_kill_skip_replaying_inotable and mds_inject_skip_replaying_inotable.

Fixes: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/61660

Contribution Guidelines

Checklist

  • Tracker (select at least one)
    • References tracker ticket
    • Very recent bug; references commit where it was introduced
    • New feature (ticket optional)
    • Doc update (no ticket needed)
    • Code cleanup (no ticket needed)
  • Component impact
    • Affects Dashboard, opened tracker ticket
    • Affects Orchestrator, opened tracker ticket
    • No impact that needs to be tracked
  • Documentation (select at least one)
    • Updates relevant documentation
    • No doc update is appropriate
  • Tests (select at least one)
Show available Jenkins commands
  • jenkins retest this please
  • jenkins test classic perf
  • jenkins test crimson perf
  • jenkins test signed
  • jenkins test make check
  • jenkins test make check arm64
  • jenkins test submodules
  • jenkins test dashboard
  • jenkins test dashboard cephadm
  • jenkins test api
  • jenkins test docs
  • jenkins render docs
  • jenkins test ceph-volume all
  • jenkins test ceph-volume tox
  • jenkins test windows

@lxbsz lxbsz requested review from a team and mchangir June 13, 2023 10:34
Copy link
Contributor

@mchangir mchangir left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Descriptions look better. But I'm still not comfortable with the option name mds_kill_skip_replaying_inotable.

joscollin
joscollin previously approved these changes Jun 13, 2023
@lxbsz
Copy link
Member Author

lxbsz commented Jun 13, 2023

Descriptions look better. But I'm still not comfortable with the option name mds_kill_skip_replaying_inotable.

Any better name ? I can fix it together.

@dparmar18
Copy link
Contributor

Descriptions look better. But I'm still not comfortable with the option name mds_kill_skip_replaying_inotable.

Any better name ? I can fix it together.

maybe mds_kill_after_journal_logs_flush ?

@lxbsz
Copy link
Member Author

lxbsz commented Jun 13, 2023

Descriptions look better. But I'm still not comfortable with the option name mds_kill_skip_replaying_inotable.

Any better name ? I can fix it together.

maybe mds_kill_after_journal_logs_flush ?

yeah, this looks better, if no objection I will rename it later. Thanks @dparmar18

@github-actions github-actions bot added the cephfs Ceph File System label Jun 13, 2023
Copy link
Member

@gregsfortytwo gregsfortytwo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you're going to rename the config option (👍) then you need to update the tests and the docs (as tagged! as well.

@joscollin
Copy link
Member

https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/61660
I think the renaming is out of scope.

@lxbsz
Copy link
Member Author

lxbsz commented Jun 13, 2023

If you're going to rename the config option (+1) then you need to update the tests and the docs (as tagged! as well.

Done. Thanks.

@lxbsz
Copy link
Member Author

lxbsz commented Jun 13, 2023

https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/61660 I think the renaming is out of scope.

Updated the tracker. Thanks.

@gregsfortytwo gregsfortytwo dismissed joscollin’s stale review June 14, 2023 13:26

names changed after this review

Copy link
Contributor

@rishabh-d-dave rishabh-d-dave left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. It would be nicer if you add a note about why are renaming this option in commit message as well as on tracker ticket. If this affects the users too, maybe add a release note as well?

@lxbsz
Copy link
Member Author

lxbsz commented Jun 16, 2023

LGTM. It would be nicer if you add a note about why are renaming this option in commit message as well as on tracker ticket. If this affects the users too, maybe add a release note as well?

Sure, will do. Thanks.

@lxbsz lxbsz force-pushed the wip-61660 branch 2 times, most recently from c54eb61 to 5850531 Compare June 16, 2023 23:42
- mds
fmt_desc: Ceph will skip replaying the inotable when replaying the journal, and
the premary MDS will crash, while the replacing MDS won't.
fmt_desc: The primary MDS will crash just after the mknode/openc journal logs
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

s/mknode/mknod ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done. thanks.

@dparmar18
Copy link
Contributor

@lxbsz the last push was just a rebase right?

@dparmar18
Copy link
Contributor

jenkins test api

@lxbsz
Copy link
Member Author

lxbsz commented Sep 8, 2023

Rebased it.

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request can no longer be automatically merged: a rebase is needed and changes have to be manually resolved

The description text are mixed for mds_kill_skip_replaying_inotable
and mds_inject_skip_replaying_inotable.

At the same time rename "mds_kill_skip_replaying_inotable", which
is a bit confusing to "mds_kill_after_journal_logs_flushed".

Fixes: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/61660
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
@lxbsz
Copy link
Member Author

lxbsz commented Sep 27, 2023

Rebased it.

@rishabh-d-dave @vshankar Could you help add this to your next qa tests ? Thanks!

@rishabh-d-dave
Copy link
Contributor

Rebased it.

@rishabh-d-dave @vshankar Could you help add this to your next qa tests ? Thanks!

I'll pick this up in next batch.

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity for 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs for another 30 days.
If you are a maintainer or core committer, please follow-up on this pull request to identify what steps should be taken by the author to move this proposed change forward.
If you are the author of this pull request, thank you for your proposed contribution. If you believe this change is still appropriate, please ensure that any feedback has been addressed and ask for a code review.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Dec 12, 2023
@lxbsz lxbsz removed the stale label Dec 26, 2023
@lxbsz
Copy link
Member Author

lxbsz commented Dec 26, 2023

Rebased it.
@rishabh-d-dave @vshankar Could you help add this to your next qa tests ? Thanks!

I'll pick this up in next batch.

@rishabh-d-dave Ping ?

@vshankar
Copy link
Contributor

Rebased it.
@rishabh-d-dave @vshankar Could you help add this to your next qa tests ? Thanks!

I'll pick this up in next batch.

@rishabh-d-dave Ping ?

@rishabh-d-dave pinging again?

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity for 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs for another 30 days.
If you are a maintainer or core committer, please follow-up on this pull request to identify what steps should be taken by the author to move this proposed change forward.
If you are the author of this pull request, thank you for your proposed contribution. If you believe this change is still appropriate, please ensure that any feedback has been addressed and ask for a code review.

@rishabh-d-dave
Copy link
Contributor

jenkins test api

@lxbsz
Copy link
Member Author

lxbsz commented Mar 25, 2024

jenkins test make check arm64

@rishabh-d-dave rishabh-d-dave added the wip-rishabh-testing Rishabh's testing label label Apr 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@rishabh-d-dave rishabh-d-dave left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rishabh-d-dave
Copy link
Contributor

Talked with Xiubo about this. Since it has approvals and QA is successful, I can proceed to merge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants