Skip to content

pacific: rgw: fix bug deleting a non-existent object also generates a delete marker#47526

Closed
kxkxk wants to merge 1 commit intoceph:pacificfrom
kxkxk:bug-fix
Closed

pacific: rgw: fix bug deleting a non-existent object also generates a delete marker#47526
kxkxk wants to merge 1 commit intoceph:pacificfrom
kxkxk:bug-fix

Conversation

@kxkxk
Copy link

@kxkxk kxkxk commented Aug 10, 2022

fix:https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/56992
Signed-off-by: Yuxuan Yang xuanyu.yang@sincerecloud.com
I don't think rgw should create a delete marker for a non-existent object

Checklist

  • Tracker (select at least one)
    • References tracker ticket
    • Very recent bug; references commit where it was introduced
    • New feature (ticket optional)
    • Doc update (no ticket needed)
    • Code cleanup (no ticket needed)
  • Component impact
    • Affects Dashboard, opened tracker ticket
    • Affects Orchestrator, opened tracker ticket
    • No impact that needs to be tracked
  • Documentation (select at least one)
    • Updates relevant documentation
    • No doc update is appropriate
  • Tests (select at least one)
Show available Jenkins commands
  • jenkins retest this please
  • jenkins test classic perf
  • jenkins test crimson perf
  • jenkins test signed
  • jenkins test make check
  • jenkins test make check arm64
  • jenkins test submodules
  • jenkins test dashboard
  • jenkins test dashboard cephadm
  • jenkins test api
  • jenkins test docs
  • jenkins render docs
  • jenkins test ceph-volume all
  • jenkins test ceph-volume tox
  • jenkins test windows

@github-actions github-actions bot added the rgw label Aug 10, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the pacific milestone Aug 10, 2022
@cbodley cbodley added needs-qa and removed needs-qa labels Oct 4, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@cbodley cbodley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bug fixes need to merge to the main branch first, then follow the backport process to stable release branches

@kxkxk kxkxk closed this Oct 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants