doc: releases: v14.2.13 release notes#37872
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Lekshmanan <abhishek@suse.com>
ab70e5e to
3398d10
Compare
|
Would it be possible to have 14.2.13 be a normal release, not a "hotfix"? We have the ceph-volume batch refactor merged into nautilus, and would like to get it out. |
|
Added @LenzGr as a reviewer since I gather there are some dashboard PRs merged into nautilus and awaiting release as well. |
I'd support shipping the ceph-volume change too. In this case there is a release notes entry waiting at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/nautilus/PendingReleaseNotes#L4 |
jan--f
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not sure about the released date. But otherwise lgtm.
92a10b1 to
423e6dc
Compare
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Lekshmanan <abhishek@suse.com>
423e6dc to
b79e404
Compare
theanalyst
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not sure about the
releaseddate. But otherwise lgtm.
updated thanks!
|
jenkins test docs |
|
@zdover23 @djgalloway any clues to why the readthedocs jobs are failing, can we retrigger? |
Looks like RTD is having issues right now. We can ignore it I think. |
|
make check failure is https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/46875 |
|
jenkins test make check |
|
@jdurgin In https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/46875#note-4 you wrote that #36839 - the fix for https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/46875 - should be backported because the bug was seen in the make check run on this PR, but this PR targeted master, not nautilus. In the meantime, I created the backport tickets on https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/46875 and @dillaman rejected them (rightfully it seems, since those backports could not possibly fix the make check failure seen in this PR). It would seem that #36839 did not actually fix https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/46875? Maybe it should be reopened? |
It fixed it -- since that particular issue was only applicable on the master branch due to changes with incorporating ASIO. Re-opening the ticket would honestly serve no purpose since there is no bug (that I know of) on the master branch (nor on the octopus branch). |
Whoops, my mistake. Thanks for clarifying @smithfarm @dillaman that failure was seen on this PR yesterday, are you saying it's already fixed? |
|
@jdurgin Sorry -- you wrote in the ticket that failure was seen in nautilus (not master). Are you saying it happened in the master branch instead? |
|
@dillaman yes, I was confused because it was release notes for nautilus, but it was on the master branch |
|
@dillaman The instance of https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/46875 was seen right here in this PR. As I write this, Jenkins has not yet deleted the console log - https://jenkins.ceph.com/job/ceph-pull-requests/62883/ - though I expect it to disappear soon. I made a less ephemeral copy of it, which is available here [1] if you're interested. [1] https://gist.github.com/smithfarm/d52b01f1214b723b46013cd9cd8ff497 |
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Lekshmanan abhishek@suse.com
Checklist
Show available Jenkins commands
jenkins retest this pleasejenkins test classic perfjenkins test crimson perfjenkins test signedjenkins test make checkjenkins test make check arm64jenkins test submodulesjenkins test dashboardjenkins test apijenkins test docsjenkins render docsjenkins test ceph-volume alljenkins test ceph-volume tox